Given the mess of untangling the CYC back-end systems from the existing CPS stuff I would really hope the new contract has a condition requiring them to keep the two operations separated. SWARCO may not have the contract for ever so they need to plan for a cleaner exit.Yeah, doesn’t sound good. It does feel like they may have created a separate back office system for CPS, instead of integrating with the existing Swarco system. Which seems costly and silly to me when their existing system already works and integrates Be.Ev, MFG and other brands on the same system.
On the other hand as an EV driver it would be nice if existing Swarco accounts just worked with CPS.