The GM Spark EV has CCS as an option too. With the number of manufacturers supporting it look likely to become the new standard.
http://bcove.me/2hvl8ui4
http://bcove.me/2hvl8ui4
I think for the foreseeable future you'll continue to get the sort of setup you get these days with both DC and AC chargers side by side. Locations that are AC only will of course just offer J1772.Paul Churchley said:It looks to me that the CCS plug will not fit into a J1772 socket on the cars so although you could use a J1772 if the car has CCS you won't be able to use the CCS charger on a car that has J1772 (Ampera). That is a pity.
Don't you mean type 2 sockets and not J1772?Duncan said:Locations that are AC only will of course just offer J1772.
Not sure. If they are offering tethered cables for CCS, why would they not put in a tethered cable for J1772 as well? So far I've only used one public charger with a tethered cable in the UK, but that seems to be the common model for the US.Paul Churchley said:Don't you mean type 2 sockets and not J1772?Duncan said:Locations that are AC only will of course just offer J1772.
I guess that is because the CCS is high power. The rapid charger systems seem to have tethered cables and the lower powered ones (below 43kw) you seem to have to provide your own cable.Duncan said:Not sure. If they are offering tethered cables for CCS, why would they not put in a tethered cable for J1772 as well? So far I've only used one public charger with a tethered cable in the UK, but that seems to be the common model for the US.
I found a new Ecotricity charging point yesterday. By new I mean you can see they haven't removed the red and white tape, and also unfortunately they hadn't turned it on.Paul Churchley said:I guess that is because the CCS is high power. The rapid charger systems seem to have tethered cables and the lower powered ones (below 43kw) you seem to have to provide your own cable.Duncan said:Not sure. If they are offering tethered cables for CCS, why would they not put in a tethered cable for J1772 as well? So far I've only used one public charger with a tethered cable in the UK, but that seems to be the common model for the US.
Just an observation... might be wrong tho![]()
That will not work because the cables do not plug together properly. You could modify the cable if you know what you are doing;As someone mentioned I plugged a standard mennekes cable (the one you plug to the 22kW charge points) to the 43KW AC fast charger but the equipment doesn't recognize that the vehicle is attached to it.
If you are describing plugging the Type 2 plug on a lose cable into a Type 2 vehicle connector tethered to a charge point - and thus connecting 2 cables end-to-end - then it's absolutely correct not to work. There's no provision in the standard for connecting multiple cables end-to-end which defeats the ability for the charge point to decode the current capacity of the cable and thus risks overload.As someone mentioned I plugged a standard mennekes cable (the one you plug to the 22kW charge points) to the 43KW AC fast charger but the equipment doesn't recognize that the vehicle is attached to it. Is this still complying with the IEC 62196 standard? The plug did seem a bit loose.
As it appears, some service areas served by ecotricity only have this type (no 22KW AC chargers) which might be an issue for some of us.
Correct, which is why I wrote "if you know what you are doing"... FYI it works perfectly and many Roadster and other EV owners have used the technique by using modified or first generation connectors (which supported daisy chaining as envisioned by Mennekes prior to the publication of the IEC standard).There's no provision in the standard for connecting multiple cables end-to-end which defeats the ability for the charge point to decode the current capacity of the cable and thus risks overload.
I don't think we should recommend cobbling up non-standard cables / connectors in order to defeat recognised international standards and potentially compromise safety. If we were to do that, and injury to people or damage to equipment resulted, who would be responsible?Correct, which is why I wrote "if you know what you are doing"... FYI it works perfectly and many Roadster and other EV owners have used the technique by using modified or first generation connectors (which supported daisy chaining as envisioned by Mennekes prior to the publication of the IEC standard).
What about the knowledgeable person who implements a lockable collar that prevents the connectors from being pulled apart?Sorry but this is nonsense - even if you knew what you were doing, what about the idiot that can simply pull the connectors apart?.
The person who modified the cable like any other DIY project.who would be responsible?
We don't usually put our DIY projects in public places. However your position appears to be that you can tell someone how to defeat an international standard, which you appear to accept has risks attached, but if anyone follows your instructions and injury results then it's their fault for modifying a cable?The person who modified the cable like any other DIY project.