A huge response would not even be read by those who believe the 'original' post.
Perhaps the only thing needing mentioning is that if the supposed author is an oil company exec who pays $1.16 kWh then everyone (including his shareholders) should seriously question his competence and/or veracity.
Point by point rebuttals to 'internet facts' is a slippery slope to insanity.
Perhaps the only thing needing mentioning is that if the supposed author is an oil company exec who pays $1.16 kWh then everyone (including his shareholders) should seriously question his competence and/or veracity.
Point by point rebuttals to 'internet facts' is a slippery slope to insanity.
