Whilst I agree entirely that battery rental is a really bad idea, my point is that only a complete idiot (like me) will sell you a Flex without being sure that you have taken over the battery rental agreement.Sounds like a great little scam to buy a flex quickly, not see the battery agreement then claim it wasn't a flex when you were sold it......
....this whole idea of battery rental really wasn't one of Renault's best....
Unless it was written off and the RCI were paid out for the battery. Then the V5 will still say Flex, but no rental is requiredIf it says on the V5 it's a Flex then it is. If it doesn't then you don't know, because they were originally issued with V5s that didn't say this and a replacement one was issued later. You don't know if the previous owner "forgot" to destroy the original V5.
.
RCI still own the battery, you cant just claim you never knew, refuse to sign the paperwork and steal (literally!) the battery from themSounds like a great little scam to buy a flex quickly, not see the battery agreement then claim it wasn't a flex when you were sold it......
....this whole idea of battery rental really wasn't one of Renault's best....
I'm not entirely sure it does. This is one of the big issues and one of the reasons the motortrade are now avoiding some EVs.Would it come up as an outstanding lease agreement on an HPI-type check?
I'd like to see what happens if you genuinely never knew then, or were sold a flex as a non-flex, and the leaseholder just stopped paying. It's the leaseholders name on the paperwork and I doubt you'll find a bailiff who'll go out and repossess a 400V battery that is live and connected to a car that they have no right to touch. Not to mention that the original owner is the one who is technically responsible for the lease, whilst the new owner could put together a reasonable case of either criminal damage or entrapment if their car were immobilised because a battery that every piece of paperwork said they owned was repossessed because of a financial agreement they had no ability to know they were responsible for.RCI still own the battery, you cant just claim you never knew, refuse to sign the paperwork and steal (literally!) the battery from them![]()
Its out of warranty. I knew this before I bought it. Mine is March 2011. And your saying then that 1 bar loss is a warranty claim ? I understood it was 3You have a 5 year battery warranty (8 years on the 30kwh). If the battery has lost a bar you could get it fixed by @Mike Schooling who offers that service. That brings it back up to low 90's SOH I believe.
More likely you will be done for receiving stolen goods. The original seller would be done for theft or at a minimum handling stolen goods. The law is never for the little man.I'd like to see what happens if you genuinely never knew then, or were sold a flex as a non-flex, and the leaseholder just stopped paying. It's the leaseholders name on the paperwork and I doubt you'll find a bailiff who'll go out and repossess a 400V battery that is live and connected to a car that they have no right to touch. Not to mention that the original owner is the one who is technically responsible for the lease, whilst the new owner could put together a reasonable case of either criminal damage or entrapment if their car were immobilised because a battery that every piece of paperwork said they owned was repossessed because of a financial agreement they had no ability to know they were responsible for.
Flex Leafs are the minority and there is no reliable method of knowing that any given Leaf is a Flex model - it's a complete and utter mess that should never really have happened!
Dont say whatever the price.....everything has a price,£2k for a 6month old Tenka and i'm sure you would have their hand offI would never buy a car with a battery lease, no matte who makes it or how cheap it is. I understand that Nissan will not replace or repair a battery under warranty or flex if it has less than 3 bars removed.
The seller cant sell something they don't own, and the buyer cant buy something from someone who does not have 'clean title' to it.I'd like to see what happens if you genuinely never knew then, or were sold a flex as a non-flex, and the leaseholder just stopped paying. It's the leaseholders name on the paperwork and I doubt you'll find a bailiff who'll go out and repossess a 400V battery that is live and connected to a car that they have no right to touch. Not to mention that the original owner is the one who is technically responsible for the lease, whilst the new owner could put together a reasonable case of either criminal damage or entrapment if their car were immobilised because a battery that every piece of paperwork said they owned was repossessed because of a financial agreement they had no ability to know they were responsible for.
Flex Leafs are the minority and there is no reliable method of knowing that any given Leaf is a Flex model - it's a complete and utter mess that should never really have happened!
Really? For the sake of Reductio ad absurdum, what about a quid for a brand new car with £70 a month battery?No I would never buy a car with a lease battery. Also - you believe what you like, when they take your car off you for having a debt on its battery - I won't say I told ya![]()