Speak EV - Electric Car Forums banner

1 - 3 of 3 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,715 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
"I find it interesting that the pundits who spend lots of time obsessing over Tesla's proposed Gigafactory have yet to mention what I think is the key reason the Tesla Gigafactory is vital to the ongoing health of the company..."

http://ht.ly/2FQV4U
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
7,452 Posts
Strange article. Even the proposed "50% degraded" MS85 has 132 miles EPA vs a gen 1 Leaf at 73 or a brand new gen 2 84 miles. Unless you could get that 85kwh pack down to maybe £5k then it wouldn't be worth putting it into a car that age/mileage. I believe Tesla are shooting for something like a 25% reduction on a current cost of about $30k.

That is for a moment assuming 50% loss actually happens. That seems unlikely without thousands and thousands of cycles. Bear in mind that 1,000 cycles in a Leaf is 73,000 miles and in an S85 it's 265,000 using EPA range. We're seeing 15% loss in a Leaf at ~650 cycles. For the S85 that's 172k miles, but let's not forget the Tesla pack is thermally managed and running at much lower C rates during both charge and discharge.


The article seems quite uninformed to me
 
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
Top