Joined
·
74 Posts
Does anyone know whether or not TPMS works with Autel MX sensors (433 MHz)?
I would like to use MX sensors instead of the original ones (which I believe are CUB sensors) because I have the Autel MaxiTPMS TS401 service tool which can ** read ** all sensors but it can only clone (write) MX sensors.
The idea is to be able to change the whole wheels (summer/winter) without having to use LeafSpy to register (re-learn) tire positions. I do not really feel like driving my car on under-inflated tires, each of which would temporarily have to be set to a specific pressure.
I asked my local Autel distributor, and they were about 90% (not 100%) sure about the compatibility. It would help if I knew the original Nissan TPMS part number, but Nissan dealers gave me several different numbers to choose from (407705ZH1A, 407003VU0A, 407006WY0B, 407705ZH0A), even though I tried my best to make them look it up by VIN.
My best option seems to be to only buy one MX sensor and test it with the car before ordering the other 3 sensors. I think I could actually test it as follows - without even touching my car, yet one of the Nissan dealers warned me against conducting such experiments; they said I could well confuse the car so much that "it would take them half a year to fix it". Obviously they want me to buy the original sensors from them; then I would have to visit them twice a year and pay them for changing the wheels.
Please let me know what ** you ** think. I think I could clone one of my existing sensors, bring it close to the car and "trigger" it using my service tool. I would have to be close enough for the signal from the MX sensor to reach the car, but not too close not to wake up any of the original sensors in the wheels - those should be sleeping (not transmitting) if I leave the car parked for a day or two. Before my test, I would start the car (put it in the ready state), but I would not move it, and I would be careful not to stomp around like an elephant, because I know it is the movement/vibrations from driving that wake up TPMS sensors, too.
Now, I think the MX sensor in my hand will detect no pressure at all, so it will send an error message to the car, and the car should complain. If I get the TPMS warning light on the dashboard, I think it will be a proof of a successful communication (i.e., compatibility) between the MX sensor and the car.
Then if I turn the car off, move the MX sensor away and then turn the car back on, in my opinion it should be ok. Do you agree, or do you think I am wrong? Would this be a safe experiment, or have I missed anything in my plan?
I would like to use MX sensors instead of the original ones (which I believe are CUB sensors) because I have the Autel MaxiTPMS TS401 service tool which can ** read ** all sensors but it can only clone (write) MX sensors.
The idea is to be able to change the whole wheels (summer/winter) without having to use LeafSpy to register (re-learn) tire positions. I do not really feel like driving my car on under-inflated tires, each of which would temporarily have to be set to a specific pressure.
I asked my local Autel distributor, and they were about 90% (not 100%) sure about the compatibility. It would help if I knew the original Nissan TPMS part number, but Nissan dealers gave me several different numbers to choose from (407705ZH1A, 407003VU0A, 407006WY0B, 407705ZH0A), even though I tried my best to make them look it up by VIN.
My best option seems to be to only buy one MX sensor and test it with the car before ordering the other 3 sensors. I think I could actually test it as follows - without even touching my car, yet one of the Nissan dealers warned me against conducting such experiments; they said I could well confuse the car so much that "it would take them half a year to fix it". Obviously they want me to buy the original sensors from them; then I would have to visit them twice a year and pay them for changing the wheels.
Please let me know what ** you ** think. I think I could clone one of my existing sensors, bring it close to the car and "trigger" it using my service tool. I would have to be close enough for the signal from the MX sensor to reach the car, but not too close not to wake up any of the original sensors in the wheels - those should be sleeping (not transmitting) if I leave the car parked for a day or two. Before my test, I would start the car (put it in the ready state), but I would not move it, and I would be careful not to stomp around like an elephant, because I know it is the movement/vibrations from driving that wake up TPMS sensors, too.
Now, I think the MX sensor in my hand will detect no pressure at all, so it will send an error message to the car, and the car should complain. If I get the TPMS warning light on the dashboard, I think it will be a proof of a successful communication (i.e., compatibility) between the MX sensor and the car.
Then if I turn the car off, move the MX sensor away and then turn the car back on, in my opinion it should be ok. Do you agree, or do you think I am wrong? Would this be a safe experiment, or have I missed anything in my plan?