Speak EV - Electric Car Forums banner

Evoke 6061-GT

1 reading
3K views 12 replies 7 participants last post by  donald  
#1 · (Edited)
Image


I've been keeping my eye on electric motorcycles for a while, as regulars will know.

Not seen how that works for faster longer range motorcycles. Small batteries equals small range. Heavy batteries equals not really a motorcycle. OK, for an urban commuter of a few miles.

However, my son recently expressed an interest in custom cruiser class of motorcycles, and I have never even ridden one before let alone consider one for myself. Always seemed to be the antithesis of motorcycles to me, which in my view should be lightweight automotive razors.

But, heh, I am open-minded and went looking for stuff my son might like and afford.

I've come to realise what the custom cruiser is about. Being heavier they are more stable and planted on the road (at 'normal' speeds), going fast isn't really the idea, but for laid back long distances. Lane splitting through heavy traffic is not really what they are about, being wider and less manoeuvrable, so quick steering manoeuvrability is not really important.

So, putting aside everything I have previously found constitutes a desirable motorcycle and accepted there is a place for custom motorcycles, I have realised that electric drive is nearly perfect for custom cruisers.

The weight becomes almost a 'pro' (they are usually 300kg or more, so once past that weight it makes little difference to moving one around in the garage), and the low speed torque is, of course, both the EV's party piece and also is what custom-cruisers (and the sub-class 'hot-rod' bikes) are about.

I'm saying all that because I might be describing the ideal electric motorcycle, and Evoke has just made one.

It's available at 30kWh and 400 miles range, and 120bhp.

Image




If I had cash spare, I think I'd try one.
 
#2 ·
495km (307mi) of “mixed riding” range (is that WLTP? or something else they’ve made up?) or 660km (410mi) of “city” range.

$25k is a bit punchy though, isn’t it? You can get a decent car for that and stay dry!

Only $10k for the Urban S with 10kWh and 250km city range, so I guess price is roughly proportional to battery size/range, weight, and performance.
 
#5 ·
You should try my ZZR1100, last time it laid down it took three of us (admittedly I was crying) to pick it up.

But I've been looking at the e-bikes for ages and it's a shame the batteries still cannot give any decent range. Like @donald I'm in the razor sharp brigade.

I just hope they solve the problem without all bikes becoming this style !
 
#6 ·
You should try my ZZR1100, last time it laid down it took three of us (admittedly I was crying) to pick it up.

But I've been looking at the e-bikes for ages and it's a shame the batteries still cannot give any decent range. Like @donald I'm in the razor sharp brigade.

I just hope they solve the problem without all bikes becoming this style !
I dropped my FJ1200 off its stand once, some decades ago, that's about the same weight as ZZR1100, and I did not like the effort of lifting it back up. 250kg about the limit. I was younger and technique goes a long way to improvise strength. I have lost youth since then and probably the skills too.

CoG is also important, I expect up to 300kg for a BEbike is manageable with technique. Custom bikes tend to ground out with limited lean angles, so they often just fall over 'slightly' than topple flat sideways. Not sure, never dropped either.
 
#9 ·
Shaft drive do suit big bikes and cruisers better, but chains will do the job OK. I think the issue/compromise here is 'reduction ratio'.

I can see a larger sprocket which reduces the chain tension but increases the chain speed. It's best to minimise chain speed, for noise and sprocket wear rates, but obviously it needs to be what it needs to be if chain is the chosen solution. As you say, that is the point at which you can consider a shaft drive.

With the torque output and sprocket size you can work out the chain speed and tension. From the angle of the chain to the front sprocket, looks to me like they are using the final drive as an opportunity for a significant gear reduction, small but very fast front sprocket, and therefore taking a reduction gear out of the 'engine', saving size and weight.

I think it is for that reason we are seeing a lot of belt-drive electric bikes, because the final drive is being used as the main reduction ratio, but that means fast speeds, so belts are better than chains. But bigger torque means belts might not suit ..... basically this is the task of 'engineering', to deduce the best optimisation.

if you used a shaft drive and had a high ratio in the rear hub, you'd end up with a big lump of metal on the end of the swingarm which would then have knock on consequences for unsprung mass, handling, suspension considerations, etc, etc..

To implement a shaft drive I would imagine need extra gears in the drive unit.

Let's say there are different solutions and it makes life 'interesting'.

I think a chain as I see it there would be running fast and probably a bit noisy, but it'd be no problem on tension capacity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CasperStorm
#13 ·
Yes, that is another option, but limits the power of the motor being small.

Direct drive motors are non-trivial. Axial flux motors have poor cogging torque issues at low speed, etc, etc.

You solve one problem and create another, like balancing plates.

There are an assortment of reliability and cooling issues putting a motor on an unsprung part, the vibration and thermal stresses have to be managed. Difficult. All are engineering decisions to balance out.
 
#12 ·
Livewire seems to be the best option out there at the moment, mainly because it’s sensibly priced, and supports CCS…. Zero and their stupid 100v system (because they use an off-the-shelf controller, Kelly possibly iirc) means they’re stuck without any sensible rapid charging, that’s pretty much useless.

Energica are nice, but top money.