Speak EV - Electric Car Forums banner

Zoe Tyre Pressures

24K views 21 replies 12 participants last post by  StinkyPete  
#1 ·
So I've had my new Zoe ZE40 R90 for a week and a half.

But how do I check the tire pressures?
Should I keep them at the manufacturer's recommended?
CanZe just reads 0 and says ok.

Thanks for your help.
 
#2 ·
canZE only displays pressures when driving I think, like a lot of Zoe owners I keep my pressures higher than Renault recommend to avoid outer tread wear and cracking, mine are at 38.5 PSI.

Hope your enjoying your Zoe as much as I do...:)(y)
 
#3 · (Edited)
You could help me by checking with your dealer if the car has TPMS valves installed, or if it uses differential speed to detect a bad tire.

In the former case CanZE should give values, but maybe indeed while driving;

In the latter case CanZE might have to query other fields which I am not aware of. And AFAIK differential speed cannot detect absolute pressure anyway, but only if a tire is "off".

I can check neither as I drive a 2013 pre-TPMS era ZOE.
 
#10 · (Edited)
That was curious. CanZE showed the tyres around 26 bar, but the Halfords gauge, which I know is pretty accurate, showed them to be 39 bar. We only drove for a few minutes, though.

Edit: That's embarrassing, I've got my units mixed up!

I'm used to PSI for tyres, so 2600 mbar is 39 PSI. So everything's hunkdory.

Thanks to Plugger1 below for pointing things out!:oops:
 
#16 ·
I think part of the reason that the British still use imperial units is that they are about the right size, i.e. in a few digits, in the metric system you often have to use micro, mili or kilo multipliers to put the numbers into a few digits. Take beer for example, we tend to drink pints, the nearest metric measure is 500mL or 0.5L. Fuel is odd, we changed our pumps to measure in litres in the late 80's but most drivers still think of fuel economy in miles per gallon. There are of course the odd exception, like the Bel for sound levels is just too large and so we use decibels. Calories are too small so we usually call a kilocalorie a calorie (quirky I know). Back in the 80's there was a move to change us over to metric measurement but it ground to a halt part way through so we have a real mixture of units. I doubt if we will change. Virtually all tape measures and rulers here have both metric and imperial scales on them. Some units like spoon sizes have been rounded to metric equivalents, at least we don't generally use cups as a measure unlike the Americans, and we generally use Celsius rather then Fahrenheit.
 
#17 ·
I grew up with Imperial measures, and ÂŁs shillings and pence, so it's difficult to equate "new" measures sometimes, without converting them.

For instance, if someone says the nearest pub is five miles away, I have a good idea of how far that is, whereas if they say it's 8 Kilometers away, that means nothing ;)

Likewise, I know if something measures an inch, six inches, or a foot, but 500mm or 680cm - no idea!
52Lbs of potatoes is a heavy bag to carry, in Kgs I've no idea, except that a bag of sugar is 2.2lbs :p

And @yoh-there - you DO drive on the wrong side of the road!! :LOL:
 
#18 ·
I'm of the generation that grew up in the late 80s/early 90s during the attempt to switch, which means I think about small distances in metres, long distances in miles, temperature in Celsius, mass in kilograms (except body mass which for some reason is stone - fractional because I just can't work in whatever its subdivision is), and I buy petrol by the litre and measure my efficiency of its use in miles per gallon.

I blame my parents. If only they'd just stuck to the nice sensible metric system and had done with it! ;-)
 
#19 ·
To be fair, I am, how should I put it, middle aged. The switch to the Euro (2002 mind you!), while a great thing economically, only now starts to feel slightly "usual". Has nothing to do with sentiments, just that things are "off". So I feel your pain, especially as, other than in my case with the Euro, there is no clear direction it seems.

Seems like @StinkyPete is in the minority here regarding PSI's? (sorry Pete)
 
#20 ·
Seems like @StinkyPete is in the minority here regarding PSI's? (sorry Pete)
It's not that I don't think PSI should be there as an option, it's just that my world is a little like @jamesremuscat's. Just because I measure distance in miles, doesn't mean I want to measure pressure in PSI.

I have the same complaint with fitness apps. I like to see how far I've travelled in miles, but don't give me the elevation in feet - that means nothing to me!
 
#21 ·
Ah OK. Thanks for that clarification. You know what. I really don't think I am going to make this a setting (UI element / screen clutter, retrieve, save, initialize at startup, check when displaying). A better option would be to rephrase that middle line "All pressures in mbar" and make it clickable to toggle between one and the other. I'll think about it a bit more.